1/1/2024 0 Comments Lightzone for fujiHowever, upon closer inspection, you can see this, about two-pixel-wide area, is pretty much messed up. (full-res image HERE – also that of the next crops)Īs you can see, there's no white area between the two (unlike with Silkypix and ACR), which is a plus. First, the area between the brownish building and the blue sea in the background: Let's take a look at the developed town landscape RAW file from the above-linked thread. Also, the results show a lot more false aliasing artifacts than the other developers this is most certainly visible in the upper right circles. Nothing like those are visible in any of the other crops I've previously posted. Here, they're a plenty – check out for example the random-colored dots introduced to the lower left, black-and-white circles. In fact, no other, by me, above-tested RAW developer did introduce false color aliasing artifacts. (full-res image, with, as usual, 100% JPEG quality, 0 CNR (instead of the default 25) and 0 Sharpening, HERE)Īs you can clearly see, LightZone has introduced a LOT of artifacts. Here's a crop of the conversion of the DPR X-T1 studio comparator RAW: The results are very bad – in no way better than with the, by me, previously scrutinized beta10. While I've had pretty bad results (see my previous LightZone developments HERE) four months ago, as a new, 4.1b14 beta has just (a week ago) been released by the devs, I've decided to re-run my tests with both the previous X-E2 and DPR's own, in this thread, discussed X-T1 RAW file. Photo Ninja, Raw Therapee and LightZone all have much better X-Trans decoding than C1.") (His entire comment is " C1 is better than LR for X-Trans, but is far from the best. In the comments section of the new C1 frontpage article, LightZone was stated as significantly better than C1 by fellow member " StephaneB".
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |